🔗 Share this article Relatives' Heartache Over Shoreline Erosion Threatening Norfolk Graves Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family. An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades. A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed. “Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.” Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated. Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground. “It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.” “I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.” A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril Along the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved. “It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.” She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.” Searching for Solutions and Clarity An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried. Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near. “The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.” A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.” He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.” “There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right answers for each community.” The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.